How To Survive a Donald Trump Presidency

Hey friends!

I’m pretty sure you are all aware that Donald Trump is, among many things, a liar, sexual predator, tax-avoider, and race-baiter.

If you disagree, well… yeah.

Anyway, want to know how to salvage your sanity? Here is my advice for YOU on how to survive a Donald Trump presidency:


It’s basic human nature to practice denial and say, “He’s just exaggerating.”

No he’s not. Trump means every word he says (or tweets). He received the support and adulation necessary to win because of his outrageous threats.

“Lock her up!”

You think that was a joke? Trump may not have “locked up” Hillary Clinton in first full week in office, but it would be foolish to then say, “Okay, maybe he doesn’t believe everything he says.”

Trump has made his plans clear. Among other things, he will dismantle Obamacare and attempt to make Mexico pay for that stupid wall. He will attempt to make members of the judicial system fall in line. He will use the judicial system to carry out his political vendettas.

Forget police issues and criminal justice reforms for a second… can you imagine his choice for attorney general, Jeff Sessions, going after Clinton on orders from Trump?


For some reason, many people are suckers for calming rhetoric from authority figures such as Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. It’s understandable, considering most are currently feeling panicked and confused. Often times, falsely reassuring words about how the world has not “technically” ended helps neutralize these feelings of panic.

Yes, the world didn’t end on Nov. 8, 2016 nor at any previous time in history. But in almost all historical catastrophes, most unfold over time. The calming rhetoric can only be neutralized for so long.


The media will be the first big institutional victim of this Trump presidency. There is no law that requires the presidential administration to hold daily briefings. There is no law that requires the White House to guarantee media access. In due time, journalists will face a very difficult dilemma…

Fall in line or get out.

The Trump administration has already challenged the investigative press and Trump himself has gone so far as to call them the “opposition party.” The power of the press will decline and the media will soon be wrapped around Trump’s finger.

Remember when Trump and Clinton argued whether Muslim Americans bear collective responsibility for acts of terrorism? The coverage of this issue further normalized xenophobia, which allowed Trump to make good on his promise of tracking down American Muslims and banning Muslims from entering the United States. In other words, the Trump administration will get to frame many important issues going forward.


If you follow point one, this will be easy. Ignore those who believe you are being unreasonable and overreacting. Going forward, you likely be one of the few hysterical people in a room. Be prepared.

Despite losing the popular vote, Trump possesses as much power as any American leader in recent history. The Republican Party controls both Houses of Congress. The country is at war abroad and has been in a state of mobilization for over a decade. Not only has Trump moved fast, but he has an unusually high level of political support. There is no doubt that he wants to increase his support, but how will he do that?

Through mobilization and war.


Don’t be Ted Cruz.

Okay, that seems kind of obvious, but don’t do what Cruz during the campaign. Don’t go from calling Trump a “pathological liar” to endorsing him and praising his victory as an “amazing victory for the American worker.” Don’t listen to the people who say “be a little more positive and hope for nothing but good to come out of this.”

Republican politicians and pundits (like Tammy Lauryn, I think that’s her name) have already fallen in line. Democrats in Congress will continue to say that they are trying to co-operate and reduce the damage. However, when mobilization is the goal, there is no such thing as “reducing the damage.”

If your soul hasn’t felt crushed already by the events of this past week… sorry, it will be soon enough.

Obama made the case that co-operation is essential for the future. I would like to ask him if he thought Congress was “cooperative” during his presidency.


Nothing last forever. Donald Trump certainly will not last forever.

What many people fail to realize is that a lack of vision for the future may have cost the Democrats this election. They failed to offer a vision to counterbalance Trump’s white-populist vision of the past.

Democrats also ignored outdated institutions of democracy that call out for reform, such as the electoral college, which has now cost them two elections. It is wrong for the candidate with the popular vote to lose an election.


Keep marching. Keep demonstrating. Keep making your voice heard

But most importantly, DO NOT STOP.

Do you have any other tips for how to survive this apocalyptic nightmare? Let me know what you think in the comment section below or send me a tweet (@danny_shin131).


Congratulations Charlamagne and Trevor Noah… YOU PLAYED YOURSELVES!

Before I delve into how Charlamagne and Trevor Noah played themselves, let’s outline the triangle of major characters:

1) Charlamagne tha God – Co-host of the nationally syndicated radio show, The Breakfast Club

2) Trevor Noah – Host of The Daily Show on Comedy Central

3) Tomi Lahren – 24-year-old conservative political commentator and host of Tomi for TheBlaze

IMPORTANT CONTEXT: Lahren’s “Final Thoughts” videos have earned millions of likes and shares on Facebook. Back in February, she criticized Beyoncé’s performance at the Super Bowl 50 halftime show, stating, “This isn’t about equality, this is about ram roding an agenda down our throats and using fame and entertainment to do so… You [and many others] just can’t let America heal. Keep ripping off the historical band-aid.”

Lahren has also been a vocal critic of the national anthem protests started by San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick. In a Facebook video titled “Sit Down Colin Kaepernick”, she states, “I support the First Amendment. I support your right to freedom of speech and expression… It protects your right to be a whiny, indulgent, attention-seeking crybaby.”

Lahren has ALSO been highly critical of the Black Lives Matter movement. Back in August, she tweeted this and then later deleted it:

“Meet the new KKK, they call themselves ‘Black Lives Matter’ but make no mistake their goals are far from equality. #Dallas #bluelivesmatter”

Now that you are familiar with the cast, let’s see how this drama unfolded:

November 30, 2016 – Lahren appeared on The Daily Show for a 26-minute interview that touched on topics such as Donald Trump, Black Lives Matter and Colin Kaepernick.

Following the taping of the show, TMZ caught Noah and Lahren grabbing drinks together in New York. Um… okay.

December 1, 2016 – Lahren’s publicist reportedly shut down an interview with The Breakfast Club, likely due to the public reaction to the Daily Show interview. It sucked, because I’m sure we were all looking forward to this interview… right?

LATER THAT DAY, TMZ caught Lahren and Charlamagne walking around Times Square. Maybe discussing why she decided to blow off an appearance on his radio show, but what do I know?

December 2, 2016 – Lahren and Charlamagne decided to pose for a few pictures, so what does the 24-year-old millennial (who, by the way, doesn’t like labels, but proceeded to label herself as a millennial in the Daily Show interview) do? Post it on her Instagram account:


A photo posted by Tomi Lahren (@tomilahren) on Dec 2, 2016 at 1:41pm PST


December 6, 2016 – Charlamagne sent out a series a tweets, essentially calling out the efforts of black and Latina women that can counteract right-wing personalities such as Lahren.


As you can imagine, that did not sit well with… well… black and Latina women.





A LITTLE OVER AN HOUR LATER, Lahren posted this on her Instagram:


December 7, 2016 – The Breakfast Club interviewed Trevor Noah for almost 45 minutes. If you would like to subject yourself, go ahead:

[end scene]

Okay… that was A LOT. So how did Charlamagne and Trevor Noah “play themselves?”

Let’s start with Charlamagne… because it’s obvious where he messed up.

What Charlamagne was trying to say is that he wishes that a black or Latina woman had similar visibility to that of Lahren. The problem was that he just couldn’t help but phrase that thought in a way that takes a direct shot at black and Latina women. To make matters worse, he used a woman who calls out and criticizes black people as his counterexample.

Congratulations Charlamagne… YOU PLAYED YOURSELF.

Now, Trevor Noah’s situation requires some CONTEXT.

Noah’s view on race in America is heavily influenced by his upbringing in South Africa. In a recent New York Times article, Noah explained that, “I grew up under the harsh racial oppression of apartheid as a person of mixed ethnicity. The lines between black and white were clearly drawn and enforced with guns and tanks, but because I am neither black nor white, I was forced to live between those lines.”

(For those that don’t know, “apartheid” was a system of institutionalized racial segregation in South Africa that took place from 1948 to 1991.)

Although Noah may see himself as neither black nor white, in America, Noah is black man.

In his lifetime, South Africa has transformed into a minority-black ruled nation as opposed to a minority-white ruled nation in the years before 1994. Noah has likely come across people in his life that changed their views on race over time.

With all of that in mind, it’s not surprising that Noah does not have American viewpoints on race and it’s understandable why he may have a certain optimism when it comes to topic involving race.

Now let’s apply these views of race to that of Lahren, who has no particular insight on any of her opinions, especially those involving Black Lives Matter. She’s famous for what she SAYS, not what she THINKS. Did anyone actually think that she would offer any insight that makes you think, “Oh, I never thought of it like that,” on the Daily Show? All she did was emphasize and double-down on the inflammatory remarks that have sparked her rise to fame.

There was no way that Noah was going to change Lahren’s thought process in a 26-minute interview, and if he was trying to change her mind, that’s not a discussion for television. That discussion is for phone calls, FaceTime, or in this case, drinks and a potential cupcake date down the line.

Okay, maybe not the cupcake date, but you get my point… making these conversations public is pointless, especially for Noah. All that does is get more people to tune in and watch a woman that spews borderline-racist propaganda converse with a black man. In this case, more eyeballs can only HELP Lahren as she continues to grow her brand.

Before extending an invitation for Lahren to come on his show, Noah should have asked himself, “Do I get anything out of this person extending their brand on my platform?” Now, the obvious response would be, “Oh, well he gets to make this woman look silly and call her out on her past remarks.”

However, the point that most people are missing is that Lahren doesn’t need Noah’s help to look silly because she does a fantastic job of doing that all by herself. So inviting Lahren to come on a left-leaning show to expose her simply reinforces what people already think about her.

In the end, Noah got very little to nothing out of this exchange and Lahren got to extend her brand to even wider audience.

Congratulations Trevor Noah… YOU PLAYED YOURSELF.

Now let’s never talk about this subject again, okay? Okay.

Well, actually… before doing that, let me know what you think in the comment section below or send me a tweet (@danny_shin131).